Home » Human Resources, LEADERSHIP » Two schools of thought on paying musicians

Two schools of thought on paying musicians

By Jeff May

In a recent ministry blog, a pastor wrote, “One thing that really bothers me is having to pay musicians to play in worship. My worship leader insists that since they are professional musicians we have to pay them. We have professional teachers teaching Bible fellowship classes and leading small groups, and none of them ask me to pay them for teaching.”

This is an argument that has been discussed for many years between church leaders. Before you read any further, just know that I cannot give you a definite answer to this age-old question. I can, however, offer some thoughts based on personal experience and observation.

To pay or not to pay

There are two schools of thought on this issue. The first is the all-or-nothing philosophy, which says that either every musician is paid or none are.

One of the churches in my hometown pays every choir member, musician and technical operator. No volunteers. Everyone takes home a paycheck. This is a lucrative set-up for many people. The churches that pay everyone on their team tend to have extremely high quality music programs. The downside is that their passion for the vision of the church can potentially get lost in the “gig” mentality.

Most churches, however, operate on the other side of this coin, where no one gets paid. This is good for the budget and church unity, but quality often suffers.

It is also important to note that just because people volunteer doesn’t mean that their motives for being involved are pure. Musicians often want the spotlight to fill their own needs and insecurities. This need transcends a payroll. The second school of thought is the pay-some-but-not-all philosophy.

This has its own set of advantages and challenges. The success of this approach hinges on clearly defining what positions get paid and what their responsibilities are.

Additional responsibilities

If you only pay some of your musicians, I would suggest giving them additional responsibilities for which they are being paid. Those responsibilities can go beyond just playing: things like organizing music, leading a sectional rehearsal or transcribing music. This can minimize the tendency for the volunteer musicians to wonder why they aren’t getting paid too.

If the church decides to pay the musicians, it is important to have a consistent scale that is clearly defined prior to hiring a musician. Each scale is different based on the community where the church is located.

In a time where churches are looking for ways to trim their budgets, it is important to be creative with alternatives to paying musicians. For instance, if space is available, consider opening up a church classroom during the week for your musicians to give private lessons, or give them priority when recommending musicians for outside paying events, such as weddings.

Using volunteers

My experience has taught me that the best results are achieved with a volunteer team of musicians who are led well. It is the job of the music director to challenge, inspire and motivate their team of musicians.

Everyone wants to be part of something great! If the music director is doing his or her job, they are constantly raising the bar of excellence and pushing the creativity to a point where people are lining up to be part of the team. As a music director, I intentionally build in frequent opportunities for our music team to surprise themselves with their ability to execute seemingly impossible music. This success creates an energy that cannot be replaced by a paycheck.

The final answer in the debate over paying musicians really lies within each team and its core values. Serving is not a core value of some churches. In those churches, paying all of the musicians is probably a better option.

In a church that promotes everyone serving and utilizing their gifts to better the local church, a volunteer team is usually the best option. There may be a few key positions within those teams that are paid, but the core is made up of volunteers.

People receive great fulfillment in knowing that they are a part of something that is contributing to a greater cause — the cause of Christ. It sounds very cliché but there is value in building treasures in Heaven that last. Teams that serve their church with passion and excellence are storing away treasure for eternity.

Jeff May is director of music ministries, North Point Church, Springfield, MO. [www.northpointnow.org]


Debriefing Worship the Monday After

“Our group comes together on Monday afternoons to debrief the service and design the upcoming services,” says Rich Nibble, director of worship arts, First Baptist Church of North Collins, CO.

“We’ve noticed that it’s very easy for debrief meetings to turn into ‘what I liked and didn’t like’ sessions without a lot of tangible takeaways.

“In order to stay on track, we’ve come up with a list we use as a guide so our debrief comments are geared toward making our services better in the future,” he says.

Vision — Did we hit the vision of the church?  Did the message come across clearly?

Climax — What and where was the climax of the service?  Is that where we wanted it? Action — What was the response we were looking for from the congregation? What were we asking them to do/learn/feel?  Did we get that message across clearly?

Connection — How well did we connect with the congregation (worship teams/announcements/drama/other creative elements/sermon/response/prayers/etc…)? Did we lead well?

Feel — Did the feel of the service match the message?  How did the flow of the service work? Did people leave energized/tired/pensive/excited/etc?

Language — Did we use insider language or would someone unfamiliar with our church (Christian/non-Christian) have understood everything that we talked about?  Did people need to bring any knowledge of the church to the service to understand certain things?

Transitions — Did we transition from element to element well?  Did we lose connection with people do to technical aspects?

Technical issues — Were there any technical issues that need to be fixed for future services or is there any training that needs to take place so we can communicate as clearly as possible?

Share

3 Comments for “Two schools of thought on paying musicians”

  1. Hello;
    In my situation I started out as a professional drummer, then played for free in a Evangelical Chirstian band for around 10 years as well as for free at churches. I continued free churches for around another 20 years, then being laid off from my new chosen career, started playing at a church that paid all it’s musicians, some strong Christians some not. I then started work & other changes ended up ending that situation. I also started to do some sequelor music again, at the same time I started doing some free work again for my home church. Then with another lay-off someone from the previous paying church started a church, & asked me to start playing. This was a paying church event pretty far from my house. I worship whole heartily, & often pray for the team & services. I guess I play sometimes for free & play for money. The flip side to this coin is, I don’t play the later Saturday night stuff anymore, & somewhat made a choice to focus on the church early morning stuff. Again, in the begining I gave up my career as a musician to play for the Lord for free, but have ended up in this situation. I don’t think it’s wrong to play Christian music for money, but would play for free in the church of my choice. At this point I do pray that God’s will be done, & feel that I’m somewhat on target for now.

  2. Well, eveyone can have opinions but what is important is what does the bible say? Kevin Parker used a passsage of scripture out of context. The passage that speaks about ‘not muzzling the ox’ is speaking about those who exegete the Word of God. There is no scriptural support for paying anyone accept those who labor in the Word of the Lord. Now, it’s an admiral jesture to pay the musicians so don’t get me wrong. The issue is when musicians who hold the church hostage over money. This is not quite the Christ-like spirit that needs to be displayed in the House of God. Now, specifically I’ve noticed that my white brothers and sisters do not put a hugh emphasis on paying musicians, although some may but it’s been my experience that most do not. Some of our black church is another story. We would rather pay a musican than move toward making every effort to learn how to leverage everything God has given us. The Pastor is a gift to the church. Nowhere in the New Testament do you find a big emphasis on buildings (they met in churches) or music…it always was ‘getting the Word of God out’ and the Pastor does that.

  3. The issue about paying Christian musicians tends to be quite a “polarising” topic. It really depends on what the musician is expected to do really. If you are invited to conduct, perform and do so at a high standard and this involves travel and so on then yes. Costs are incurred and the church should be mature and meet the legitimate costs involved for the musician/s. They can certainly find the budget for the Pastors new car or the steeple to be fixed and the myriad other trade and service costs involved with their churches. The Christian musician can not be the only free link in the food chain. It just does not work like that out in the real world. We play several instruments which all require different strings. The van will not travel on fresh air; overnight accommodation and a host of other “real world” costing’s come into play. The deal is that either the musician is out of pocket or the church financially equips. No where does the Bible teach about freebies; quite the contrary; Muzzle not the Ox that treads the corn; He who sows should look forward to eating from the grain and so on. There is just no Biblical justification for using and exploiting people in the church. The formula is pretty simple; If the church community will not bless the various experienced musicians and so on then these ministries can not continue to bless the church community. If any one has difficulty with this then think about the literally hundreds of dollars and years of dedication to lessons, practice and son on to gain a high level of performance. Then think of the cost of buying Guitars, Mandolins. Bouzoukis and so on. Then consider the constant request to learn new materials and rehearse these to a satisfying level for both the performer and the congregation. Spiritualising all this is rather trite I think. We live in the real world with real demands and expectations placed upon us. These require real costs, financial and so on.
    I f communities want a certain standard and quality it costs the musicians a great deal to do this. The communities need to mature and realise that there is no such thing as a free lunch. Christian communities need to be prepared to contribute towards legitimate expenses at least and grow up; We live in the real world. Don’t complain when it becomes hard to find competent musicians in the future. Cheers, Kevin.

Leave a Reply